Technology-Enabled Active Learning Strategies (TEALS): A Workshop

James L. Morrison, Facilitator

Employers are expressing increasing dissatisfaction with the ability of college graduates to access, evaluate, and communicate information; to use information technology (IT) tools effectively; and to work well within groups across cultural lines. A change of instructional paradigms--from passive to active (authentic) learning strategies, such as project-based learning, problem-based learning, or inquiry-based learning--is clearly needed.

Purpose

The purpose of this workshop is to first look into the future and its implications our institution, our curriculum, our students, and our careers. Second, we want to explore an instructional approach that may be more effective in preparing our students for their futures. Specifically, we will explore what is meant by technology-enabled active learning strategies, how these strategies relate to student success, what the barriers are to implementing these strategies across academic departments, and what approaches can be used to facilitate incorporating these strategies in our instruction.

Preparation 

Please review the following publications prior to the workshop:

1. Mack, T. "An Interview with a Futurist." Futures Research Quarterly, 2003, 19 (1), 61-69
2. Morrison, J. L. (1996). "Teaching in the Twenty-First Century." On the Horizon, 4(5).
3. Dori, Y. J. and Belcher, J. "How Does Technology-Enabled Active Learning Affect Undergraduate Students' Understanding of Electromagnetism Concepts?" The Journal of the Learning Sciences, (2004), 14 (2), preprint.
4. Morrison, J. L. (2005). "Experiencing the Online Revolution." In G. Kearsley (ed.),Online learning: Personal Reflections on the Transformation of Education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
5. Morrison, J. L. and Long, P. "The iCampus technology-enabled active learning project at MIT: An Interview with Phillip Long. Innovate 5 (5). Available online at http://www.webcitation.org/60KsOprSv.
6. Morrison, J. L. and Long, P. "Technology Enhanced Learning at MIT. Higher Education Teaching and Learning Portal. Available online at http://hetl.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/HETLReviewVolume1Article5.pdf and archived at http://www.webcitation.org/65DSUIsjZ
7. Brown, M., Auslander, M., Gredone, K., Green, D., Hull, B., and Jacobs, W. (2010)." A Dialogue for Engagement." EDUCAUSE Review, 45 (5), 38-56.
8. Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Approaches That Work: How Authentic Learning is Transforming Higher Education. [Download PDF file from "View this resource:"
9. Lombardi, M. M. (2008). Making the Grade: The Role of Assessment in Authentic Learning. [Download PDF file from "View this resource:"]
10. Woo, Y., Herrington,J., Agostinho, S., and Reeves, T. C.(2007)."Implementing Authentic Tasks in Web-Based Learning Environments." EDUCAUSE Review, 30 (3).
11. Page, C. (2007)."Why Today's Students Value Authentic Learning." [Download PDF file from "View this resource:"]

Also: Please consider reviewing (and participating in) three discussions on Linkedin’s Ideagora group related to using TEALS in Asia and the Middle East as well as a discussion focusing on faculty resistance to TEALS.

Part I Agenda 

09:30 - 10:30 Anticipating the future
10:30 - 10:45 Break
10:45 – 11:15 Identifying trends and events that will affect the future of our students
11:15 – 11:45 Selecting the most critical trends and events
11:45 - 12:30 Implications of the most critical trend or event affecting our students' future

Part II Agenda 

13:30 - 14:30 Reportbacks from Agenda I activity
14:30 - 15:00 What do we mean by technology-enabled active learning strategies?
15:00 - 16:00 Are these strategies important in improving instructional effectiveness?
16:00 – 16:20 Break
16:20 – 17:00 What are the barriers to faculty members adopting these strategies?
17:00 – 17:30 How can we encourage faculty members to adopt these strategies?